POULTRY EXECS CHARGED IN PRICE-FIXING PROBE: As lawmakers and livestock producers increasingly call for antitrust action against major beef packers, federal prosecutors on Wednesday issued their first criminal charges in a separate investigation into collusion in the poultry industry. The case: The government alleges that executives from Colorado-based Pilgrim's Pride and Georgia's Claxton Poultry conspired from 2012 to 2017 to rig bids and discounts for broiler chickens offered to grocery chains and cooperatives buying on behalf of restaurants, reports POLITICO's Leah Nylen. — Jayson Penn, president and CEO of Pilgrim, was indicted along with Roger Austin, a vice president at the company. Claxton President Mikell Fries and Vice President Scott Brady were also charged. Fries is also treasurer of the board for the U.S. Poultry & Egg Association. — If convicted, the executives could face up to 10 years in prison, though no individual convicted of price-fixing in the U.S. has ever received a sentence of more than six years. Neither of the companies were named or charged in the indictment. The big picture: It's the Justice Department's first major action amid rising public pressure to crack down on anti-competitive behavior in the highly concentrated meat and poultry industry. DOJ and USDA are also investigating major beef processors for potential price-fixing, because of disparity between the prices of live cattle and retail beef, which widened during the coronavirus pandemic. Rob Larew, president of the National Farmers Union, said price-fixing is "a symptom of the much bigger problem of corporate consolidation," noting that five companies control 60 percent of the U.S. chicken market, while other meat sectors are even more concentrated. "Ultimately, it means those companies pay farmers even less for their hard work while charging restaurants, grocery stores and American consumers more for food," he said in a statement. SUGAR INDUSTRY SEEKS STRICTER LABELING FOR SWEETENERS: The Sugar Association is urging the FDA to require manufacturers to more clearly flag sweeteners like stevia, sucralose and sugar alcohols on food packaging. The move comes as more companies look to ditch added sugars, which already must be listed on the updated Nutrition Facts panel, Pro Ag's Helena Bottemiller Evich reports. What they want: The trade group's petition calls for requiring that those ingredients be followed by the word "sweetener" in parentheses on food labels, and that products marketed toward children list the name and amount of such sweeteners on the front of the package. — Products marketed as "reduced sugar" or "no sugar" should include another line below the claim indicating which sweetener was used as an alternative, the group said, as well as a disclaimer that the products are "not lower in calories" unless they are at least 25 percent less caloric than comparison foods. — "Consumers want access to information," said Courtney Gaine, the group's president and CEO. "They want to know what's in their food and where it comes from." Next steps: The FDA has 180 days to respond to the petition, and it's unclear how receptive the agency will be to the group's requests. Officials have already spent several years on a major update to nutrition labeling. |
No comments:
Post a Comment