Wednesday, September 30, 2020

Opinion Today: ‘I can’t bear four more years of this’

Our writers on the first presidential debate.
Author Headshot

By John Guida

Politics Editor, Opinion

Hi, I’m John Guida, a politics editor here on the Opinion desk. After last night’s chaotic presidential debate, we collected reactions and analysis from 16 writers and columnists. Exclusively for readers of this newsletter, here’s what four of them thought mattered most.

Ross Douthat

Americans don’t trust Trump to handle the coronavirus, they don’t particularly like him, they aren’t particularly scared of Biden, and all of those facts still matter more than anything we saw tonight.

Michelle Cottle

What mattered most? Biden did not fall apart or let Trump beat him up or give any ground. This will reassure his twitchier supporters, who were fearing the worst. Trump partly has himself to blame. He and his team spent so much time questioning Biden’s mental fitness that the vice president needed only to stay awake for the full 90 minutes in order to beat expectations. There’s no way anyone was going to fall asleep during that food fight.

Peter Wehner

This debate was disgraceful and painful to watch; everyone knows the reason was Trump. The psychological effect of this debate will be fairly profound on the majority of Americans, which is, “I can’t bear four more years of this.” Trump is the most intensely unlikable candidate in American history, and that matters.

Elizabeth Bruenig

When Biden explained in simple terms why it’s important to be kind — not just from the standpoint of individual relationships, but for the survival of liberal democracy — he hit upon something crucial. This form of government requires certain virtues and a willingness to understand things from different points of view is one of them. I would argue that willingness to understand is a form of love, and one that isn’t easily inculcated into hardened hearts. Biden didn’t say all of that, of course, and I’m not sure he would endorse it. But he did set his sights on something much more critical, in that short speech, than specific policies or elections.

ADVERTISEMENT

Forward this newsletter to friends …

… to share ideas and perspectives that will help inform their lives. They can sign up here. Do you have feedback? Email us at opiniontoday@nytimes.com

Here’s what we’re focusing on today:

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Contact Us

If you have questions about your Times account, delivery problems or other issues, visit our Help Page or contact The Times.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

David Leonhardt's newsletter is now the Opinion Today newsletter. You received this email because you signed up for David Leonhardt's newsletter or the Opinion Today newsletter from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

Tuesday, September 29, 2020

Opinion Today: ‘Whyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy?’

Where were you when you heard Ruth Bader Ginsburg had died?
Author Headshot

By Lauren Kelley

Editorial board member

Where were you when you heard Ruth Bader Ginsburg had died?

I realize I’m looking back with wispy nostalgia at an event that took place a week and a half ago. But that’s about 15 years in Trump Time. And even amid all the madness of this era, I think many of us will remember that moment for the rest of our lives.

I was in a cabin on Fire Island, on an anniversary trip with my husband. We had just picked up a pizza for dinner when my phone started to buzz. “NO,” one friend’s text message read. “Whyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy?” pleaded another. There were many expletives that I cannot repeat here.

That moment felt really, really bad — and not just because I was spending a romantic getaway sitting on the floor next to a power outlet, fighting with a shaky Wi-Fi connection so I could work. (Sorry, babe.) It wasn’t even that we had lost an icon — someone I and so many others looked up to with such reverence. It was losing this enormously important person now. Something about R.B.G. almost, but not quite, holding on long enough to get the chance to be replaced by a Democrat felt maximally devastating. Instead, Donald Trump has the chance to put another hard-right justice in her seat, bringing us one huge step closer to, among other things, the unraveling of Roe v. Wade.

ADVERTISEMENT

I thought about that while reading Joan C. Williams’s Op-Ed today on the future of Roe. Ms. Williams, a law professor at the University of California, Hastings, rightly notes that in many ways the constitutional right to an abortion, as established by Roe in 1973, has been so chiseled away that it effectively doesn’t exist for many women in America today. What good is the right to an abortion if the laws in your state are so strict — and the number of clinics so small — that it’s all but impossible to get one?

Ms. Williams is also right that reproductive rights supporters need to be thinking beyond Roe — brainstorming strategies for protecting bodily autonomy in a world in which Roe has been overturned or gutted beyond recognition. Because now that Mr. Trump has selected Amy Coney Barrett as R.B.G.’s likely replacement, that world is well within reach.

I wouldn’t dare try to predict how so many things will unfold over the next year — let alone the next week. Will The Times’s revelations about Mr. Trump’s tax returns change the course of the election? If he loses, will he leave office willingly? If not, what then?

Still, I think it would behoove all of us to start imagining an increasingly plausible scenario playing out next summer. It’s the end of Justice Barrett’s first term on the Supreme Court bench, and a bombshell abortion rights case is about to be decided. We’re nervously staring at SCOTUSblog waiting for the news to come down. And there it is. Our phones buzz. Expletives. Tears.

Many of us will remember where we were when we heard the news for the rest of our lives.

ADVERTISEMENT

Forward this newsletter to friends …

… to share ideas and perspectives that will help inform their lives. They can sign up here. Do you have feedback? Email us at opiniontoday@nytimes.com

Here’s what we’re focusing on today:

ADVERTISEMENT

Contact Us

If you have questions about your Times account, delivery problems or other issues, visit our Help Page or contact The Times.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

David Leonhardt's newsletter is now the Opinion Today newsletter. You received this email because you signed up for David Leonhardt's newsletter or the Opinion Today newsletter from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018