FARM SPENDING BILL SET FOR HOUSE MARKUP: The Appropriations Committee will meet at 10 a.m. to consider a trio of fiscal 2021 measures, including the Agriculture-FDA bill. The legislation filed on Sunday was widely praised by Republicans and Democrats alike at a subcommittee hearing this week, but today the amendments will start flying. That means there's sure to be some heated debate on issues like food stamps and meatpacking rules that have been in the spotlight during the pandemic. Heads up: For anyone planning to tune in, the ag bill is expected to be considered second out of the three. Appropriators already gave USDA an earful in their bill report released Wednesday, a largely non-binding document that spells out lawmakers' thoughts and instructions to the agencies under their jurisdiction. For one, members said the Food Safety and Inspection Service has "tragically failed to protect its workforce" during the pandemic, noting that at least four FSIS inspectors have died from Covid-19 after the department "failed to promptly provide PPE to inspectors." They directed the agency to publish data on internal Covid-19 cases and deaths as soon as the spending bill is approved by the committee. The panel also took issue with the department's lack of transparency surrounding last year's relocation of the Economic Research Service and National Institute of Food and Agriculture from D.C. to Kansas City — an abrupt and controversial move that caused an exodus of veteran researchers from the agencies. "The committee reiterates its frustration at the repeated difficulties it experiences in getting basic information about the move from the department," they wrote. "ERS and NIFA are shells of their former selves, and the loss of institutional knowledge each agency has suffered will take years to overcome." Keep us in the loop: The panel also directed USDA to update appropriators about upcoming policy changes before sharing details with "non-governmental stakeholders" or the public. And lawmakers said they're "concerned about the department's tardiness in implementing new initiatives" funded in previous appropriations bills. More highlights: The report asks USDA to prioritize coronavirus relief funds for farmers and ranchers who comply with CDC requirements to keep their workers safe through sanitation and social distancing. It also calls for a departmental plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture and for officials to fund research into the impact of climate change on the nutritional value of crops. Hot hemp and Victory Gardens: Lawmakers also requested data on the number of hemp acres that must be destroyed because a crop exceeds the 0.3 percent THC limit; and they suggested that USDA leaders launch a new "Victory Garden" campaign in areas with higher hunger rates, citing past national efforts to bolster the food supply during wartime. FARM GROUPS HOST ONLINE AG TOWN HALLS: Since there aren't many ag conventions and state fairs this year, industry groups are putting on a series of online forums for farmers and ranchers to discuss issues like trade headwinds, supply chain disruptions, rural economics and the future of agriculture. The events will run up to two hours and feature panel discussions, Q&A sessions and online polling. Who's in? The trade groups involved run the gamut from dairy producers and exporters to corn and soybean growers. They include the National Association of State Departments of Agriculture, Iowa Soybean Association, Plant Based Products Council, National Corn Growers Association and Farmers for Free Trade, among others. The groups plan to announce the so-called AgTalks series later today. The first session will be held in Iowa on July 30, followed by events in Minnesota, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin in August and September, tentatively. "We believe it is past time for a national conversation focused on solutions to help American ag rebound," they said in a joint statement, shared exclusively with MA. "The health of rural America and the hope of economic resiliency will only occur if we can create a non-political dialogue that brings the pillars of production, processing and logistics together to help redefine trade policy to best enable the most productive, safe and secure delivery of food." |
No comments:
Post a Comment