Wednesday, October 14, 2020

Opinion Today: The upside of this crisis

It's a chance to rethink child care.
Author Headshot

By Alicia P.Q. Wittmeyer

Culture Editor, Opinion


The idea for Bryce Covert’s latest piece came from a simple observation: Wasn’t it baffling, she wrote me late this summer, that some counties were planning to keep schools closed for in-person teaching — and so as a result, in-person child care centers had been opened up in their place? These policy choices, she said, seemed … odd. “Instead of free, in-person schooling, you get expensive in-person child care, which is different how?” she wrote.

Our mutual confusion over this — why was one deemed safe, if the other wasn’t? — convinced us that this was a subject worth exploring further. The result is a deep dive we recently published by Bryce on the divergent histories that shaped child care and schooling in the United States.

We have, Bryce argues, long drawn a fairly arbitrary distinction between “school” — a place where kids 5 and older go during the day to learn and, coincidentally, are supervised by responsible adults — and “child care,” a place where kids younger than 5 go during the day to be supervised by adults and, coincidentally, develop and learn.

This wasn’t always the case. Back in the day, when “schools” weren’t much more than single rooms with a teenage girl standing at the front of them, it wasn’t uncommon for pupils to trudge off for the day, 6-month-old siblings in tow. (Did you know that said 6-month-olds were often parked in front of the schoolhouse fires for the day to sleep and stay warm? Adorable! What’s that? They were undersupervised and sometimes fell into the fires? …. oh.)

ADVERTISEMENT

But in the 1800s, America’s school system was revamped and reformed; schools were now the serious business of the state, places where the country's youngest citizens would learn how to become participants in democracy. (No time for putting out flammable babies.) Child care, meanwhile, developed around a totally different logic and imperative: Moms — yes, even then — needed to work. And they needed somewhere safe for children to go while they did so.

The result, more than a century on, is a dichotomy that didn’t work well even before the pandemic. We have a state-run school system that remains wildly disconnected from the schedules of working parents — why do school days finish in the midafternoon? what’s up with summer vacation? — and a largely-private child care system that is expensive and patchwork.

“It has taken a once-in-a-lifetime crisis to reveal what was always true,” Bryce writes. “School is — whisper it — a form of child care; child care, at its best, fosters children’s development.”

Recognizing the false dichotomy is the first step. But can we take this once-in-a-lifetime crisis as an opportunity to put together something better?

ADVERTISEMENT

Forward this newsletter to friends …

… to share ideas and perspectives that will help inform their lives. They can sign up here. Do you have feedback? Email us at opiniontoday@nytimes.com

Here’s what we’re focusing on today:

ADVERTISEMENT

Contact Us

If you have questions about your Times account, delivery problems or other issues, visit our Help Page or contact The Times.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

David Leonhardt's newsletter is now the Opinion Today newsletter. You received this email because you signed up for David Leonhardt's newsletter or the Opinion Today newsletter from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

No comments:

Post a Comment