This, of course, is the moral intuition of a simple newspaperman, not substantive analysis grounded on legal theory or political history. But the nice thing about being an editor is that I can ask the people who know things what they know — and find out if there is something to my intuition. And the nice thing about being an opinion editor is that I can ask those same people how things could be brought back into balance, how the Supreme Court ought to be returned to its proper shape and size.
That is how today’s special package, “How to Fix the Supreme Court,” came into being. It contains six pieces each pitching an idea for how to reform the court, plus two more crucial components. The first is an essay from New York Times Magazine’s Emily Bazelon describing the history that has led us to this point, and a conservative dissent from the idea that the court should be reformed at all, from Randy Barnett.
I hope you find the project interesting and informative. I’ll see you in these pages after the election — happy voting!
|
No comments:
Post a Comment