Thursday, July 1, 2021

Opinion Today: Why do only rich Americans get to enjoy trees?

This environmental inequality has huge ripple effects.

By Yaryna Serkez

Graphics Editor, Opinion

As a record heat wave moves across the Pacific Northwest, some Americans are lucky to seek refuge in the cooling shade of the surrounding trees. But who gets to enjoy these lower temperatures travels along the typical lines of inequality in America: income and race.

From Los Angeles to Boston, lower-income communities and communities of color live in areas with a higher share of impervious surfaces such as parking lots, highways and dense residential buildings. A new tool developed by the conservation group American Forests has shown that some wealthy neighborhoods enjoy almost 50 percent more greenery compared to lower-income communities.

There is also a direct link between discriminatory policies of the past and who gets to live in green areas today. Decades of redlining have limited investments and economic growth in nonwhite and immigrant neighborhoods. Today, most prestigious areas graded "A" have, on average, twice as many trees as those deemed "D-graded," a recent study shows.

This environmental inequality has huge ripple effects. In a warming world, trees have become critical infrastructure, preventing about 1,200 heat-related deaths in America each year while also boosting educational performance, improving physical and mental health, lowering crime rates and fostering economic opportunities.

So what would it take to provide all Americans with equal access to greenery?

This is the question I take on with Ian Leahy, the vice president of urban forestry at American Forests, in my latest analysis for Opinion. According to the tool his organization developed, Americans would need to plant 522 million more trees to reach green equity. We explore how American cities could achieve this ambitious goal and how both public and private sectors could make our cities healthier and safer for everyone.

The effort to plant more trees would pay dividends — improving health, quality of life and slowing climate change, all while supporting over three million jobs, especially in neighborhoods that need it most.

ADVERTISEMENT

Here's what we're focusing on today:

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Subscribe Today

New York Times Opinion curates a wide range of views, inviting rich discussion and debate that helps readers analyze the world. This work is made possible with the support of subscribers. Please consider subscribing to The Times with this special offer.

Games
Here is today's Mini Crossword and Spelling Bee. If you're in the mood to play more, find all our games here.

Forward this newsletter to friends to share ideas and perspectives that will help inform their lives. They can sign up here. Do you have feedback? Email us at opiniontoday@nytimes.com

Contact Us
If you have questions about your Times account, delivery problems or other issues, visit our Help Page or contact The Times.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for the Opinion Today newsletter from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

LiveIntent LogoAdChoices Logo

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

No comments:

Post a Comment