Wednesday, July 28, 2021

Opinion Today: She changed astronomy forever. But you’ve probably never heard of her.

Meet Jocelyn Bell Burnell, the woman who discovered pulsars.

By Andrew Blackwell

Supervising Editor, Op-Docs

Documentary filmmakers search for inspiration in all sorts of places. In headlines of bygone front pages, in the corners of underappreciated subcultures and in troves of their own home movies, they're looking for stories that will connect with people — and say something meaningful.

When the filmmaker Ben Proudfoot and my Op-Docs colleague Lindsay Crouse dreamed up our Almost Famous anthology of short films, they hit on a remarkably fruitful method for finding stories. Instead of focusing on the headlines of yesteryear, they looked … just to the side.

Next to the story of the Project Mercury astronauts, there's an extraordinary tale of a Black test pilot who never made it to space. In 1960s Liverpool, underneath the screams of untold thousands of Beatles fans, there are four young women whose reaction to Beatlemania was to form their own band.

But these aren't sour-grapes histories. The people in Proudfoot's films leap off the screen with energy and humor. They argue not that life robbed them of their chance for success, but that success — and life — turned out to be something more complex and bittersweet than they expected.

This week, we published a new chapter of Almost Famous. In "The Silent Pulse of the Universe," the astronomer Jocelyn Bell Burnell tells the extraordinary story of how, as a young Ph.D. student, she discovered pulsars. Exotic star remnants that spin like cosmic lighthouses, pulsars have been called "the universe's gift to physics" for the ways they allow astronomers to test the predictions of Einstein's theory of general relativity. And their discovery soon resulted in a Nobel Prize for the Cambridge scientists who led the research — but not for Burnell.

ADVERTISEMENT

The omission led the great astronomer Sir Fred Hoyle to object that Burnell had been robbed of her deserved recognition — but Burnell herself maintains that missing out on a Nobel citation didn't bother her. What did bother her, however, was the intense sexism she faced in her career, in both the scientific world and the press. Reporters covering the discovery of pulsars cast Burnell as little more than an attractive young girl who had helped with the research, and even asked her for her bust and hip measurements.

But the meaning of Burnell's career comes not from the resistance she faced as a young woman in science, but from her undiminished passion for discovery, and how she used her renown (when it came) to help demolish hurdles for those who followed. That's the true story of this film, and of our series: not of chances missed, but of deeper opportunities fulfilled.

ADVERTISEMENT

Here's what we're focusing on today:

ADVERTISEMENT

Subscribe Today

New York Times Opinion curates a wide range of views, inviting rich discussion and debate that helps readers analyze the world. This work is made possible with the support of subscribers. Please consider subscribing to The Times with this special offer.

Games Here is today's Mini Crossword and Spelling Bee. If you're in the mood to play more, find all our games here.

Forward this newsletter to friends to share ideas and perspectives that will help inform their lives. They can sign up here. Do you have feedback? Email us at opiniontoday@nytimes.com

Contact Us If you have questions about your Times account, delivery problems or other issues, visit our Help Page or contact The Times.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for the Opinion Today newsletter from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

LiveIntent LogoAdChoices Logo

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

Tuesday, July 27, 2021

Opinion Today: How can the U.S. compete with China? Build on Trump’s policy.

Tariffs are essential.
Author Headshot

By John Guida

Staff Editor, Opinion

At a time when most of what we're hearing about U.S. trade policy with China has focused, from the left and the right, on beefing up U.S. industrial policy, here's a voice that insists we should not overlook the value of tariffs as well.

In a guest essay today, Robert Lighthizer — the U.S. trade representative under President Donald Trump and a deputy trade representative under President Ronald Reagan — argues that in the economic competition between China and America, Beijing is using all of the tools available to an authoritarian government to overtake us, and that the United States must use all those in a free democratic system, including tariffs, to win.

In a brief Q. and A., I dug into this with him a bit further — particularly his experiences in the Trump and Reagan administrations. He offered a few more thoughts on why tariffs are a key lever for the United States in competing with China.

John Guida: Could you, in a couple of sentences, explain why you think tariffs are an important tool of economic policy?

Robert Lighthizer: Tariffs are extremely important. First, they are a legitimate source of revenue to help pay for government programs. Those who sell in the United States should contribute to paying the bills. Second, they can be effective in offsetting the unfair advantage of other countries' industrial policies and unfair practices. Why should American workers pay the price for other countries' cheating? Third, tariffs can be an effective part of our own industrial policy: They can be used to encourage domestic production of needed products (like P.P.E.). Finally, tariffs can be used as leverage to open other countries' markets to American exports.

ADVERTISEMENT

JG: Are there one or two things from your time as trade representative in the Trump administration that you think are applicable to what's going on now with regards to China policy?

RL: President Trump really changed the way most people in our country think about China. He got us to see them not as a benign partner but as an adversary that wants to be number one in the world. Putting in place tariffs on $370 billion of China's exports and obtaining the Phase One economic and trade agreement signaled the most significant economic and foreign policy change in a generation. Coupled with export control improvements, investment restrictions and other measures, the Trump administration had a policy of serious engagement. So far the Biden administration has maintained these policies, and I'm pleased that they have.

JG: You served in the Reagan administration as deputy trade representative. The primary competition then was with Japan. How was that similar to and different from America's competition with China today?

RL: Engaging on the issue of Japanese industrial policy was a great achievement of the Reagan administration. Many sectors — from automobiles to steel to semiconductors — were under assault and it was not fair trade. Though he was roundly criticized by free traders and globalists, President Reagan rose to the occasion to protect American jobs and industries.

ADVERTISEMENT

But there was a major difference. Japan was our close ally. They wanted to advance but they needed us to succeed, too. That is critical.

Here's what we're focusing on today:

ADVERTISEMENT

Subscribe Today

New York Times Opinion curates a wide range of views, inviting rich discussion and debate that helps readers analyze the world. This work is made possible with the support of subscribers. Please consider subscribing to The Times with this special offer.

Games Here is today's Mini Crossword and Spelling Bee. If you're in the mood to play more, find all our games here.

Forward this newsletter to friends to share ideas and perspectives that will help inform their lives. They can sign up here. Do you have feedback? Email us at opiniontoday@nytimes.com

Contact Us If you have questions about your Times account, delivery problems or other issues, visit our Help Page or contact The Times.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for the Opinion Today newsletter from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

LiveIntent LogoAdChoices Logo

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018